Sean Escola

The cortex amplifies responses to novel stimuli while suppressing redundant ones. Novelty detection is necessary to efficiently process sensory information and build predictive models of the environment, and it is also altered in schizophrenia. To investigate the circuit mechanisms underlying novelty detection, we used an auditory “oddball” paradigm and two-photon calcium imaging to measure responses to simple and complex stimuli across mouse auditory cortex. Stimulus statistics and complexity generated specific responses across auditory areas. Neuronal ensembles reliably encoded auditory features and temporal context. Interestingly, stimulus-evoked population responses were particularly long lasting, reflecting stimulus history and affecting future responses. These slow cortical dynamics encoded stimulus temporal context and generated stronger responses to novel stimuli. Recurrent neural network models trained on the oddball task also exhibited slow network dynamics and recapitulated the biological data. We conclude that the slow dynamics of recurrent cortical networks underlie processing and novelty detection.

The role of the motor cortex in executing motor sequences is widely debated, with studies supporting disparate views. Here we probe the degree to which the motor cortex’s engagement depends on task demands, specifically whether its role differs for highly practiced, or ‘automatic’, sequences versus flexible sequences informed by external cues. To test this, we trained rats to generate three-element motor sequences either by overtraining them on a single sequence or by having them follow instructive visual cues. Lesioning motor cortex showed that it is necessary for flexible cue-driven motor sequences but dispensable for single automatic behaviors trained in isolation. However, when an automatic motor sequence was practiced alongside the flexible task, it became motor cortex dependent, suggesting that an automatic motor sequence fails to consolidate subcortically when the same sequence is produced also in a flexible context. A simple neural network model recapitulated these results and offered a circuit-level explanation. Our results critically delineate the role of the motor cortex in motor sequence execution, describing the conditions under which it is engaged and the functions it fulfills, thus reconciling seemingly conflicting views about motor cortex’s role in motor sequence generation.

Thalamocortical loops have a central role in cognition and motor control, but precisely how they contribute to these processes is unclear. Recent studies showing evidence of plasticity in thalamocortical synapses indicate a role for the thalamus in shaping cortical dynamics through learning. Since signals undergo a compression from the cortex to the thalamus, we hypothesized that the computational role of the thalamus depends critically on the structure of corticothalamic connectivity. To test this, we identified the optimal corticothalamic structure that promotes biologically plausible learning in thalamocortical synapses. We found that corticothalamic projections specialized to communicate an efference copy of the cortical output benefit motor control, while communicating the modes of highest variance is optimal for working memory tasks. We analyzed neural recordings from mice performing grasping and delayed discrimination tasks and found corticothalamic communication consistent with these predictions. These results suggest that the thalamus orchestrates cortical dynamics in a functionally precise manner through structured connectivity.

The ability to sequence movements in response to new task demands enables rich and adaptive behavior. However, such flexibility is computationally costly and can result in halting performances. Practicing the same motor sequence repeatedly can render its execution precise, fast and effortless, that is, ‘automatic’. The basal ganglia are thought to underlie both types of sequence execution, yet whether and how their contributions differ is unclear. We parse this in rats trained to perform the same motor sequence instructed by cues and in a self-initiated overtrained, or ‘automatic,’ condition. Neural recordings in the sensorimotor striatum revealed a kinematic code independent of the execution mode. Although lesions reduced the movement speed and affected detailed kinematics similarly, they disrupted high-level sequence structure for automatic, but not visually guided, behaviors. These results suggest that the basal ganglia are essential for ‘automatic’ motor skills that are defined in terms of continuous kinematics, but can be dispensable for discrete motor sequences guided by sensory cues.

Neuroscience has long been an essential driver of progress in artificial intelligence (AI). We propose that to accelerate progress in AI, we must invest in fundamental research in NeuroAI. A core component of this is the embodied Turing test, which challenges AI animal models to interact with the sensorimotor world at skill levels akin to their living counterparts. The embodied Turing test shifts the focus from those capabilities like game playing and language that are especially well-developed or uniquely human to those capabilities – inherited from over 500 million years of evolution – that are shared with all animals. Building models that can pass the embodied Turing test will provide a roadmap for the next generation of AI.

The neural mechanisms that generate an extensible library of motor motifs and flexibly string them into arbitrary sequences are unclear. We developed a model in which inhibitory basal ganglia output neurons project to thalamic units that are themselves bidirectionally connected to a recurrent cortical network. We model the basal ganglia inhibitory patterns as silencing some thalamic neurons while leaving others disinhibited and free to interact with cortex during specific motifs. We show that a small number of disinhibited thalamic neurons can control cortical dynamics to generate specific motor output in a noise-robust way. Additionally, a single “preparatory” thalamocortical network can produce fast cortical dynamics that support rapid transitions between any pair of learned motifs. If the thalamic units associated with each sequence component are segregated, many motor outputs can be learned without interference and then combined in arbitrary orders for the flexible production of long and complex motor sequences.